Categories
domains

SOPA Support Prompts Customer Exodus From GoDaddy. Oh, And We Are Leaving Too.

It’s all over the news and if you have missed it – it’s too bad. GoDaddy recently announced their strong support for SOPA/PIPA legislation only to revert their position once public outcry started affecting their bottom line. It is obvious that reversal is a purely a PR stunt and a bad one at it. No one argues that any company is out there to make money, but advocating legislation that, in the long run, will prevent people from making more money is plain stupid. The SOPA support game that GoDaddy has got themselves into is a short small gain, long big loss kind of a deal and any company that has any future plans should have known better than that. Judging by GoDaddy’s recent actions – they don’t. This leads to only one simple conclusion – I cannot afford to trust my domains and domains of my clients to company who can’t forecast their own future within a year or two. Nothing personal, just business – can’t trust the company that doesn’t know what it is doing.

Having said that – I have begun the process of moving my domains away from GoDaddy. First 7 are already on the way to Name.com right now. As you can imagine, transferring some 140 domains away from GoDaddy is a significant expense and is time consuming, however, I feel very strongly about making a move. The process will be gradual – at the end of the month I will move a batch of domains that are scheduled to renew in the next month or two. It will not generate a big lump in GoDaddy’s monthly reports and I probably will not receive a phone call from GoDaddy begging me to return. However, I will feel somewhat better knowing that my money will not fund the idiocy and waste that is SOPA/PIPA.

Happy New Year everyone.

Categories
clients

It’s The Matter Of Perception


It's the matter of perception - Small Business BlogLately I have been busy managing things. There are many different things that need managing and it takes different kinds of people to manage certain things. Having said all that, everyone, especially in the small business area, have to know (or learn) to manage their own perception. In other words, you have to know how to control the way people perceive you.

Let’s consider the following example. The company has just hired a technical expertise person, who they call ‘developer’ for lack of a better word. Company itself does not maintain any IT staff, rather relying on multiple outside vendors to provide services. Immediately upon the introduction of the ‘developer’ to vendors they went from happy and content to almost hostile. The obvious reason was that from their perspective the ‘developer’ is going to take away from their plate and take over most, if not all, work some of them are doing. Company’s management happily

Now, had this ‘developer’ been introduced to vendors by using his actual title – which included the word “manager” – things would have went a lot easier. Vendors would understand that the real goal of that person coming aboard would be to manage company’s relationship with those very vendors, having a more streamlined way of communicating requirements and processing feedback. In a way, this person should be a single point of contact between vendors and the company, removing or significantly reducing ambiguity and redundancy in processes.

However, by not managing the proper perception of the role, the company management created an obstacle in their relationship with vendors that wasn’t there before. Had the proper perception management applied – there would be no hostility whatsoever.

Managing the way your business partners and vendors perceive you and people who work for you is an important stage in relationship development. A lot of small businesses miss the opportunity to build on this early on and playing a catch-up game to resolve the issues that should not have been there in the first place.

Categories
business

Interviewing Candidates – What Your Questions Say About You

It’s no secret that an interview is a two-way process, at the same time when you are asking your candidate a question and evaluate their performance based on responses the candidate across from you doing exactly the same. Your questions, your reactions and even your body language can tell candidate a lot about you – and shape up his next response.

There are a few things to be aware of. Sometimes you don’t want to pass along anything at all and put on your “poker face”. If your candidate is any good he will immediately realize that and figure you are hiding something. What is it that you are hiding he doesn’t know, but it can make him either too nervous and uncertain if he even gets anywhere near what you are looking for, or too confident that you are trying to hide something bad about the job itself and, as a result, such candidate will pass on your offer even if it is better than your competitor’s.

There are no set rules, of course, but there are few cases that pretty much outline the major mistakes hiring side made during the process. I happened to be interacting with either business that was hiring or coaching the candidates so I have sort of first-hand information on each account.

Case 1: Business advertised a managerial position with some hands on skills required. At the beginning of the interview process candidate was assured that position requires about 30% of actual hands-on process as there are other people who handle it. However, the technical part of the interview was so detailed to one particular aspect of hands-on operations that candidate immediately assumed that this part will be his engagement 100% of the time. As a result, candidate has turned down the job offered to him.

Case 2: During the interview process the hiring manager repeatedly advised candidate on his skills as an interviewee instead of concentrating on actually interviewing the candidate on skills pertaining to the job – according to candidate’s account such comments added up to about 30% of the overall interview time. As a result the candidate has turned down the next round of interviews suggesting picking up someone from the kindergarten so that the hiring manager can fully embrace his father-role in the game.

Case 3: The interview with the hiring manager was immediately followed by two more separate interviews with two members of the team. Questions that two team members were asking, aside from basic concepts, revolved around the same technical problem presented in two slightly varied ways. Candidate decided not to proceed with the interview with third team member on the assumption that the team is looking for a solution to a problem, not another team member, and was using the interviews to extract some fresh ideas from candidates.

Case 4: Business advertised a position that had a split responsibilities between managing outside vendors and hands-on work in house. On the last round of interview he was asked the question of which part of this dual-hat wearing position he would appreciate more, to which he responded that ultimately he would be interested in managing the processes 100% of his time. Business, after very long consideration, decided to go a different route and hire two people to handle both aspects separately. The candidate was not offered a job, since business considered him overqualified for hands-on job and not having enough experience for managerial role.

Case 5: Recruiting company approached a candidate with a consulting position for an undisclosed company that was conducting a “discreet candidate search to replace one of the workers”. The interview, done by one of the consultants, consisted of basic questions on technology as a whole and complaints about the person being replaced. Most notable complaint was “he works like he’s playing chess, sitting there, thinking”. Given that the work required significant amount of mental labor it was very strange that one of the main issues with the worker that was being replaced was that he isn’t typing as fast as the other consultant. Obviously, the candidate turned down the position with words “I don’t want to get fired for needing to stop and think”.

As you can see, there are a few early signs that business is not ready to make a move on hiring a candidate right now or even do not know which qualifications of the candidate are most important. A well prepared candidate can spot these signs and decline a job even though you might want him for your company. Here are a few stop signs that, while not definite red flags, but are taken as “proceed with caution” signs. You might want to avoid them when hiring.

– Hiring manager saying “We will hire when we’ll find the right candidate” – tells the candidate you are not ready to make a move so he can move on.
– Interviewers asking “Have you ever worked with _some tiny little niche of the responsibilities_?” – tells candidate that’s all you really care about.
– Interviewers not asking anything except very basic questions when interviewing for anything above very junior level or asking about minute details without assessing conceptual understanding first – tells candidate someone wrote those questions for you and all he has to do is guess the right answer.
– Interviewers asking for specific area of knowledge or resolution to specific problem while disregarding anything else – tells the candidate you are looking for a solution to an immediate problem and he may not work for you as long as you promised him he would.
– Interviewers asking questions directly from “Worst 100 interview questions” book without even realizing it – tells candidate you simply don’t know what you are doing.